Helena Narmont vs Lola Mireille Glantz Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Narmont 1 - 0 Glantz

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Narmont has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Glantz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Narmont, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Glantz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Narmont has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Glantz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Narmont has won 60% of matches played (W/L 6/ 4), with Glantz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Narmont has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 23/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 9% (W/L 1/ 10). Glantz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 7/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
• Player level: In the last year, Narmont has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/ 3), where as Glantz has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Narmont winning 1 times and Glantz being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Narmont winning 2 and Glantz winning 0. The last match between Narmont and Glantz was at the W15 Monastir, 14-12-2020, Q3, Hard with Helena Narmont getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Narmont and Glantz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Narmont winning 0 times and Glantz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Narmont winning 1, and Glantz 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Narmont has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.3 while Glantz has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Narmont has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Glantz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Narmont has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Glantz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.